FeedBoss Review: Is This LinkedIn Content Tool Worth $59?

TL;DR

FeedBoss is worth looking at if LinkedIn is important to your business or personal brand. The $59 AppSumo Tier 1 gives a solo user enough to properly test the whole workflow, including AI content, a Knowledge Base, scheduling and analytics, and where you can have all your planning, writing, content storage and publishing process in one place.

I'd stick with Tier 1 at $59 unless you actually need multiple LinkedIn accounts or team members.

FeedBoss at a Glance

What FeedBoss Actually Does

FeedBoss is built around the idea that your LinkedIn content shouldn't start with a blank AI prompt every time you want to publish something - you connect your LinkedIn profile and give FeedBoss information about yourself, your business and the subjects you know about. Its Persona Profile and Knowledge Base are then used when generating content, alongside information from your existing LinkedIn presence.

The Knowledge Base is quite useful too, because otherwise you're basically asking another AI system to produce generic business content. That's not difficult to do. ChatGPT can do it, Claude can do it and about a million other tools can do it.

The entry-level AppSumo tier includes voice and text Knowledge Base content, while the higher tiers add more capacity and formats. FeedBoss also says its system can learn from the edits you make to generated posts, so repeated corrections can influence future content.

The $59 FeedBoss AppSumo Deal

There are four AppSumo tiers:

The $59 Tier 1 is the one I'd pay attention to.

You get one LinkedIn account, one workspace and one member, along with 400 monthly AI credits and 2,000 one-time credits, and there's also 25GB of media storage, five LinkedIn profile audits per month and ten tracked engagement profiles, which is plenty for a person running one LinkedIn profile.

The higher tiers are much easier to justify if you're managing clients or several profiles - tier 3, for example, moves up to ten LinkedIn connections and ten team members, while Tier 4 reaches 25 connections and 30 members.

FeedBoss normally charges $29 per month for Creator, $59 per month for Pro and $149 per month for Studio, although the normal plans and AppSumo tiers aren't exact equivalents, which does make the lifetime deal interesting if you're confident you'll actually use the software. It doesn't make the bigger AppSumo packages automatically good purchases.

What You Get on Tier 1

This is where I think the deal makes sense for a normal solo user, simply because ou're not getting a deliberately crippled version of FeedBoss just to get people through the door - the main workflow is there, and the restrictions are mainly around scale.

That's a much better situation for a lifetime deal because you can actually find out whether the product fits into your working routine without needing to upgrade immediately, which is always good.

The Content Workflow

The strongest part of FeedBoss isn't really the writing, as while the writing is useful,  AI writing has become a commodity. What I care about more is what happens before and after the post is generated, and FeedBoss gives you a lot - content ideas, a Knowledge Base, a content calendar and scheduling, so there's a path from having something worth saying through to actually getting it onto LinkedIn.

FeedBoss also has an Authority Map on the higher tiers. The idea is to identify the subjects you're already building authority around and find areas where you have more content opportunities, which would come in handy if you're trying to build a recognisable subject area rather than just pumping out disconnected posts.

The Knowledge Base Could Be the Difference

This is the feature I'd spend some time setting up properly if I bought FeedBoss - you can put your own information into the system instead of expecting it to know what makes your experience different from everybody else's.

For example, a consultant could put in their methods, opinions, customer problems and previous material, while a founder could give it information about the business, lessons learned and areas of expertise, and a creator could build up a library of their existing knowledge.

Then the AI has something specific to draw from, which still isn't a replacement for editing, but if the output sounds like every other LinkedIn post, change it, as the whole point of feeding the system your own material is to get away from generic content, not to publish whatever comes out of the box.

This is also why I'd be wary of anyone buying FeedBoss purely because it says AI LinkedIn content generator on the tin, because here are cheaper ways to generate text, the value here is in everything surrounding the text.

FeedBoss Has More Than Posts

FeedBoss can also create different forms of LinkedIn content, including images, carousels, infographics and slide decks, depending on the plan and available credits, so you don't have to use a separate tool every time you decide a normal text post needs a visual, but there are still limitations here.

Recent AppSumo questions show that some workflows aren't as automated as you might expect. For example, FeedBoss has acknowledged that some bulk media and caption workflows aren't available yet, and some video functionality is also restricted to higher tiers and is still being developed.

That's not a deal-breaker for me at $59, but it does mean you shouldn't read the feature list and assume everything works like a completely mature enterprise platform - FeedBoss is still developing.

FeedBoss Scheduling and Analytics

The scheduling side is straightforwardly useful, you can create content in advance and put it into a content calendar, rather than remembering every few days that you haven't posted anything, and the analytics then give you information about your posting activity and engagement, which matters a llot because otherwise you're just guessing whether the extra content is doing anything.

This is also where FeedBoss is different from simply using ChatGPT and LinkedIn's native scheduler, as that combination can work perfectly well. In fact, if you only publish occasionally, I'd probably recommend doing exactly that rather than buying another subscription.

FeedBoss becomes more useful when you're producing enough content that managing the process starts becoming annoying.

FeedBoss vs Other LinkedIn Tools

There are already plenty of tools trying to solve this problem, so FeedBoss needs to offer something more than “AI + LinkedIn”.

The choice is fairly simple once you stop looking at feature lists.

If you're managing multiple social networks, something like SocialBu is more appropriate.

If you're mainly interested in simple scheduling, Buffer may be enough.

If you only post occasionally, LinkedIn's own scheduler costs nothing.

If you want to build the whole system yourself, ChatGPT plus LinkedIn can obviously do it.

FeedBoss is for the person who wants the LinkedIn-specific workflow already put together.

What Are AppSumo Customers Saying About FeedBoss?

The AppSumo feedback is positive, but there are enough useful complaints in there to stop this becoming a “4.9 stars, therefore buy it” review - one of the recurring positives is the quality of the generated content. A verified purchaser who had bought 15 AppSumo deals before said they had generated 14 posts and only needed to edit one of them, while another buyer specifically liked FeedBoss's interview-style generation because it combines their own expertise with AI rather than starting with generic prompts.

Another verified purchaser said the scheduling was the standout feature, with weeks of content being mapped out and queued and only minimal editing needed. They also said FeedBoss had got closer to their voice than most tools they'd tried.

There are some very specific criticisms, though.

The biggest complaint is still the workflow

One recent reviewer gave FeedBoss five tacos but pointed out that there isn't a proper bulk workflow for creating a month of content with images or carousels already attached. Text posts can be planned quickly, but adding visual content still involves more manual work.

That's a fair criticism because the whole appeal of FeedBoss is saving time. If you're generating 20 posts and then have to manually deal with the visual assets one at a time, some of that time saving disappears.

The good thing is that the team is actually responding to this sort of feedback rather than ignoring it. In another AppSumo thread, a customer pointed out that infographics couldn't be added directly to posts. FeedBoss responded that it had fixed the issue and deployed the update.

There are also some more fundamental limitations worth knowing about.

A September customer complained that FeedBoss couldn't access LinkedIn posts restricted to connections rather than being publicly visible, where the founder acknowledged the problem and said a major update was coming, followed by work on the issue.

That's more significant than a missing button because it affects what FeedBoss can actually see and use from a LinkedIn account, so I'd therefore treat LinkedIn access and API limitations as one of the things to keep an eye on rather than pretending every part of the platform is already sorted.

There are a few smaller complaints too. One customer reported bugs with follower counts and carousel edits, while another asked about company-page auditing and was told that company-page audits weren't supported yet and had been added to the roadmap.

The support response is probably the other thing I'd pay attention to. FeedBoss's team is replying directly to complaints, fixing individual problems and explaining why it won't add certain features - for example, when a customer asked for DM automation, the company said it wasn't going to introduce automated DMs because of the potential risk to LinkedIn accounts.

That's actually a good decision in my view. A LinkedIn tool that starts doing aggressive automated connection and DM activity might look more powerful on a feature list, but it could also create a much bigger problem for the people using it.

Who FeedBoss Makes Sense For

I'd consider FeedBoss if you're a founder, consultant, freelancer, creator or B2B marketer and LinkedIn actually matters to your business - it's especially useful if you know you have plenty of things worth talking about but don't consistently turn them into posts..

I'd also consider it if you're trying to build a personal brand around a particular area of expertise. Having a system that keeps you focused on a handful of subjects is more useful than generating random posts about whatever happens to be trending that morning.

Who Should Skip It

If LinkedIn isn't important to you, there's no reason to buy it.

Likewise, if you only post once every couple of weeks and don't struggle with ideas, you probably don't need a dedicated LinkedIn content platform, and Id also skip it if your expectation is that FeedBoss will produce completely finished content that never needs touching, because it won't.

You still need to read what it generates. You still need to make sure it actually sounds like you. You still need to add opinions and experience where the AI doesn't have them - that's not a criticism unique to FeedBoss. It's just the reality of using AI for personal-brand content.

Is FeedBoss Worth Buying on AppSumo?

At $59, I think there's a reasonable case for it.

The lifetime deal gives a solo user enough of the product to actually use the main workflow without having to spend hundreds of dollars on a higher tier, so if you already know that LinkedIn is something you're going to work on consistently, the one-off price is fairly easy to justify compared with paying a monthly subscription.

It isn't perfect, and there are still areas where the product feels like it's being built rather than finished. But that's a reasonable trade-off at the entry-level lifetime price.

Founder Worth Score

7.9/10

Founder Worth Verdict

WORTH CONSIDERING

For a solo LinkedIn user, Tier 1 at $59 is the FeedBoss deal I'd buy. It gives you the core product without forcing you into an expensive lifetime tier designed for agencies and larger teams.

The deciding factor is whether you actually want a dedicated LinkedIn content workflow - if you do, there's enough here to make the price sensible. If all you need is the occasional AI-written post, save the $59 and use the tools you already have.